Choose fontsize:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
News
jamiepearce
January 17, 2024, 07:59:51 PM
 Evening.been out the picture for a few years.is there any weekenders coming up this year?
rookypair
January 04, 2024, 09:57:08 AM
 I think everyone has dispersed in all directions. Good to see some of the original peeps posting to 
rjm
January 03, 2024, 11:26:38 PM
 This site is pretty dead now! 
TOMTOM
January 03, 2024, 05:38:50 PM
 HI IM HERE ANY RALLYS
dances with badgers
December 28, 2023, 09:40:42 AM
 the dreaded social media lol
DEADLOCK
December 27, 2023, 08:26:38 AM
 Still going social media plays a big part 
dances with badgers
December 26, 2023, 10:41:07 PM
 This site used to be amazing, where has everybody gone? 

View All

 

Currently there is 1 User in the Chatroom!





Click here if you
need van signs


Or here if you
need magnetic signs


Or here if you
need a
Corporate Video Production Company in Milton Keynes

See our
privacy policy here


Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Treasure Rewards - Who is legally entitled?. Finder or Landowner?  (Read 2790 times)
Junkman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 104



« on: October 03, 2009, 10:57:51 AM »

This perplexes me. With regards the treasure act, it is commonly said that the 'finder gets a reward'. Is this legally correct as surely it is the landowner. It is the landowners land and therefore they own what is on and within it, including anything of value. The detectorist finds something but I would have said that the legal entitlement is to the landowner who in theory, splits it 50/50 with the finder.

The reason i ask this is that there is often criticism that detectorists get financial gain but I don't think that is automatically true. Surely it is the landowners prerogative as to whether or not they wish to gain financially?

If I was to find and declare and item values at say £100k, but the landowner being charitable and wealthy says to a museum " you can have it for free" then where does the finder stand on this?
Logged

Teknetics T2 - C Scope R1 - Laser Trident 2 - Pinpoint Probe - Spade - Wellies
********************************************************
One man on a mission to find and record the history of our great nations last 60 years of discarded,useless metallic Junk. So far i'm doing really really well.
robson (chris)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 253


« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2009, 11:11:21 AM »

i assume the museum would have to give the finder his share of the value as it is 50/50 and that is what he is entitle to. so the land owner could not give it free as the finder is entitle to half.i think im sure some one will correct me if im wrong
« Last Edit: October 03, 2009, 11:13:42 AM by robson (chris) » Logged
Malcolm.mtts
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 276

Every Day is a Lovely Day


WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2009, 11:14:52 AM »

The Law says 50/50 split

The landowner or the finder can offer to forego their share of the evaluation.

The landowner can not give away the finders share and vice versa.

If the landowner decided to give it away "Free" then that would only represent his share and not the finders share.

All that would happen is that the museum actually buys it for £50k and not £100k
Logged

Every Day is a Lovely Day
Tafflaff (Rob)
Deputy Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5732


Etrac user 55


« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2009, 11:22:49 AM »

By giving you permission to detect , the land owner is inadvertently agreeing to the treasure law. Really though you should have a signed agreement between you and the farmowner. I honestly do not know where you would stand if a landowner just turned around and said

" I did'nt give permission for him/her to detect here "    where do we stand here guys?  Huh
Logged

There is only so many times one can turn the other cheek.
Stig(The)
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1609

X-Terra 70 user.


« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2009, 11:28:34 AM »

Behind the "Farmer" with your spade raised to head height  Huh
Then...... "TWANG"  Shocked 
Problem solved!  Roll Eyes

  Cheesy   Grin   Wink
Logged

The challenge of history is to recover the past and introduce it to the present.
Malcolm.mtts
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 276

Every Day is a Lovely Day


WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2009, 12:39:42 PM »

I agree Millsy, a written contract or agreement on what happens if something is found can, and will be the deciding factor if the matter went to Court.



Logged

Every Day is a Lovely Day
Charles Cater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 471


WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2009, 02:54:13 PM »

I understood that the coroner has the last word who should get what?
Usually it is up to him and after that comes the agreement thrashed out between the farmer and the finder.

If the agreement is different to the coroners verdict that is OK but the money given goes first to the Finder and Farmer and split at different levels then after.

EXAMPLE.
Found - A gold hoard worth - according to "experts" worth a value of, say, £100,000

The hoard is now valued at £100,000 and bought by a museum at that price.
The coroner, I believe, sets the distribution of the money at 50-50

The contract with the farmer and finder is agreed at 60-40, the finder getting the higher figure by agreement.

So after all this the finder gets £40,000 and the farmer gets £60,000, that was what was stipulated on the agreement.

If it was me involved and knowing how much it should have been worth I would involve a solicitor to make sure the agreement is valid. I think that without the law being involved it could be a dicy situation.
Just my interpretation of what should happen.










Logged

Say nought and you won't be controversial, or so they say?

http://detectoruser.co.uk

http://members.boardhost.com/Tom1/
Junkman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 104



« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2009, 04:57:52 PM »

Interesting. I haven't seen a definitive opinion though.

So, imagine this scenario.

I ask farmer can I detect on his land and he says 'help yourself' No agreement, just permission to detect and off I go.

I then find something to the value  for example and declare it as treasure and after the process the Treasure committee says " that's worth £100K".

Who stands where then?. No written agreement, no verbal agreement other than "yes, you can detect on my land"

The reason I ask is detractors of the hobby say we do it for greed and money which in 90% of cases is not true. If you think you are going to get rich in this hobby, then you are deluding yourselves.

So when you see headlines saying " Joe Bloggs found a Saxon thingamy bob valued at " the detractors jump on this and say they are doing it for money.

Logged

Teknetics T2 - C Scope R1 - Laser Trident 2 - Pinpoint Probe - Spade - Wellies
********************************************************
One man on a mission to find and record the history of our great nations last 60 years of discarded,useless metallic Junk. So far i'm doing really really well.
Salty (Karl) Cardiff Scan Club
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 689


Uses an E-trac and a G2


WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2009, 02:38:31 PM »

Behind the "Farmer" with your spade raised to head height  Huh
Then...... "TWANG"  Shocked 
Problem solved!  Roll Eyes

  Cheesy   Grin   Wink



 Grin Grin rofl Grin Smiley
Logged



Never Mistake my Kindness for Weakness

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Home
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal