Choose fontsize:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
News
jamiepearce
January 17, 2024, 07:59:51 PM
 Evening.been out the picture for a few years.is there any weekenders coming up this year?
rookypair
January 04, 2024, 09:57:08 AM
 I think everyone has dispersed in all directions. Good to see some of the original peeps posting to 
rjm
January 03, 2024, 11:26:38 PM
 This site is pretty dead now! 
TOMTOM
January 03, 2024, 05:38:50 PM
 HI IM HERE ANY RALLYS
dances with badgers
December 28, 2023, 09:40:42 AM
 the dreaded social media lol
DEADLOCK
December 27, 2023, 08:26:38 AM
 Still going social media plays a big part 
dances with badgers
December 26, 2023, 10:41:07 PM
 This site used to be amazing, where has everybody gone? 

View All

 

Currently there is 1 User in the Chatroom!





Click here if you
need van signs


Or here if you
need magnetic signs


Or here if you
need a
Corporate Video Production Company in Milton Keynes

See our
privacy policy here


Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: I now have a Ctx3030 and back beach hunting!  (Read 7682 times)
matthewbullingham123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


« Reply #15 on: March 02, 2018, 10:54:56 AM »

Cheers Mick, only have the standard coil atm will probs upgrade in the future. I have had a play with the settings and got use to the sounds etc . Had a gold wedding band last week and digging deep targets .

Some nice finds coming from swansea bay!

Seee you both on the beaches
Logged
probono
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2570


Nihi nisi sub sole


« Reply #16 on: March 02, 2018, 09:33:56 PM »

Thanks badgers for calling me to the board. First point is the coil. If you have standard 11" coil ctx is like the average machine but with 17" is the deep beast. Better than sov, little bit deeper in my opinion and defo better on separation targets close to big iron, second - DO NOT USE ground balance, turn it off, use only noise cancel. Set up with coil few inches above ground surface. This is two basic rules rest is just "cosmetics".

I'm assuming that would be similar for the ETRAC?
Logged
Mick
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 157



« Reply #17 on: March 02, 2018, 11:56:02 PM »

I'm assuming that would be similar for the ETRAC?

Never worked with etrac, there is no much similarities I think.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Home
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal