Choose fontsize:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
News
jamiepearce
January 17, 2024, 07:59:51 PM
 Evening.been out the picture for a few years.is there any weekenders coming up this year?
rookypair
January 04, 2024, 09:57:08 AM
 I think everyone has dispersed in all directions. Good to see some of the original peeps posting to 
rjm
January 03, 2024, 11:26:38 PM
 This site is pretty dead now! 
TOMTOM
January 03, 2024, 05:38:50 PM
 HI IM HERE ANY RALLYS
dances with badgers
December 28, 2023, 09:40:42 AM
 the dreaded social media lol
DEADLOCK
December 27, 2023, 08:26:38 AM
 Still going social media plays a big part 
dances with badgers
December 26, 2023, 10:41:07 PM
 This site used to be amazing, where has everybody gone? 

View All

 

Currently there is 1 User in the Chatroom!





Click here if you
need van signs


Or here if you
need magnetic signs


Or here if you
need a
Corporate Video Production Company in Milton Keynes

See our
privacy policy here


Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Part of button (possibly Gold)  (Read 2210 times)
Greg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 304



« on: June 27, 2015, 08:11:52 PM »

My first post, found today.
Can you help identify.
Looks like part of Button.
From exposed metal on back, looks like gold.


* image.jpg (140.45 KB, 741x711 - viewed 204 times.)

* image.jpg (127.95 KB, 759x635 - viewed 271 times.)
Logged
Val Beechey
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6120



« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2015, 10:20:32 PM »

That must have been a cracking button when it was new.  I'd say it was probably brass or copper as gold doesn't tarnish. Always nice to dream though. Wink
Logged

Ever Optimistic, it's out there somewhere - And I Found it
Greg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 304



« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2015, 09:45:24 AM »

Thanks Val.
If you don't ask you don't learn.
So if we go for a copper/brass item, do you have an idea of the Date?
Logged
Val Beechey
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6120



« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2015, 04:21:37 PM »

No not really Greg other than to say it's been in the ground for a long time judging by the state it's in.  I'd have to do the same as the Archies and say post medieval, officially 1601 onwards.

It is an interesting one though.  Looks like a crown on
 one side and it's unusual to have such intricate patterning on both sides (I think)
Logged

Ever Optimistic, it's out there somewhere - And I Found it
dingdong
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2965


MAD COWS EAT METAL DETECTORISTS !!!🐂🐂🐂🐂🐂🐂


« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2015, 03:50:01 PM »

Well found Greg,and congratulations on your first post👍
Logged
Chef Geoff
Archaeological and Hardware Advisor
Dark Lord
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9368



WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2015, 04:47:11 PM »

Why after 1601 Val Huh
Logged
Val Beechey
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6120



« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2015, 08:40:19 PM »

Well, why ? Geoff.  I looked up dates for post Medieval and it said 1485 but most have now pushed it forward to 1601.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_Medieval

Please don't shoot the messenger  Grin
Logged

Ever Optimistic, it's out there somewhere - And I Found it
Chef Geoff
Archaeological and Hardware Advisor
Dark Lord
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9368



WWW
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2015, 09:20:33 PM »

Ahh now your in to the murky water between history and archaeology Undecided Historically the end of the medieval comes with the death of Richard III in 1485 as this is the neat changeover of power from the House of Plantagenet to that of Tudor and can't be moved however archaeology relies on a more tangible physical change, Bronze Age, Iron Age, Roman, Saxon and Norman all have their own "styles" and so can be neatly pigeon holed but when it comes to this 1485 cut off there is no physical change, if you had fallen asleep in the reign of Richard III and awoken in the reign of Henry VII or early VIII you probably wouldn't of noticed any difference in the trappings of day to day life and it's not until late Henry VIII or Lizzy that things are noticeably different (but still not as late as 1601) I'm not sure who has or is using a later date but for accuracy it's better to still use the 1485 date Wink
Logged
Val Beechey
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 6120



« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2015, 09:29:05 PM »

Not if you're talking about Rip Van Winkle in Wales  Grin Roll Eyes
Logged

Ever Optimistic, it's out there somewhere - And I Found it

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Home
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal