Choose fontsize:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
News
jamiepearce
January 17, 2024, 07:59:51 PM
 Evening.been out the picture for a few years.is there any weekenders coming up this year?
rookypair
January 04, 2024, 09:57:08 AM
 I think everyone has dispersed in all directions. Good to see some of the original peeps posting to 
rjm
January 03, 2024, 11:26:38 PM
 This site is pretty dead now! 
TOMTOM
January 03, 2024, 05:38:50 PM
 HI IM HERE ANY RALLYS
dances with badgers
December 28, 2023, 09:40:42 AM
 the dreaded social media lol
DEADLOCK
December 27, 2023, 08:26:38 AM
 Still going social media plays a big part 
dances with badgers
December 26, 2023, 10:41:07 PM
 This site used to be amazing, where has everybody gone? 

View All

 

Currently there is 1 User in the Chatroom!





Click here if you
need van signs


Or here if you
need magnetic signs


Or here if you
need a
Corporate Video Production Company in Milton Keynes

See our
privacy policy here


Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
Author Topic: Quick Question & Answers.  (Read 17012 times)
dances with badgers
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5171



« Reply #45 on: March 21, 2012, 05:03:57 PM »

april lol
Logged

if music be the food of love ,sing me a trifle.
 2012 WITH ETRAC,PULSEPOWER GOLDSCAN MK2 and SOVEREIGN ELITE     
gold = loads lol
Chef Geoff
Archaeological and Hardware Advisor
Dark Lord
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9368



WWW
« Reply #46 on: March 21, 2012, 05:05:58 PM »

June 14th, 0310 ferry from Dieppe
Logged
Kev
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5798


"there as got to be more there " SE & XS user


WWW
« Reply #47 on: March 21, 2012, 05:08:15 PM »

Chef its.600-100BC...
"Who exactly were the Celts?" is a question which vexes historians on a daily basis. The first written evidence suggests that they were seen in the region North of the Alps around 1000-600 BC, known collectively as "the Keltoi" - but as a wandering race, they were chased to the nether regions of Western Europe - there are traces of them around the coasts of Italy, Spain, Portugal and the Lowlands - before finally settling in what we know these days as the United Kingdom, Ireland and Brittany (in France). But if they were chased out of the Alps for being wandering tribes, where did they come from before that?
Logged
Kev
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5798


"there as got to be more there " SE & XS user


WWW
« Reply #48 on: March 21, 2012, 05:08:37 PM »

In 43AD, the Roman Emperor Claudius invaded Britain. How long did it take the Romans to finally conquer Wales? Huh Huh Huh Huh
Logged
dances with badgers
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5171



« Reply #49 on: March 21, 2012, 05:11:01 PM »

200 years because they had to stop a lot to take in all the lovely scenary Grin
Logged

if music be the food of love ,sing me a trifle.
 2012 WITH ETRAC,PULSEPOWER GOLDSCAN MK2 and SOVEREIGN ELITE     
gold = loads lol
Chef Geoff
Archaeological and Hardware Advisor
Dark Lord
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9368



WWW
« Reply #50 on: March 21, 2012, 05:14:36 PM »

78AD, though there was that scrap in that Mansio down the Cardiff  Road, but I guess that didn't count
Logged
Kev
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5798


"there as got to be more there " SE & XS user


WWW
« Reply #51 on: March 22, 2012, 08:49:12 AM »

correct Chef............................. 35 years.....................

Many is the story told of the Romans' attempts to conquer Wales - one of the most notable is of the Legions, under Paulinus in 61AD, turning up on the coast near what we now call Caernarfon, and being faced apparently by thousands of ghosts on the opposing shore, latter day Anglesey. The Legions were spooked by this, Paulinus tore up his orders from the Emperor Nero, and promptly turned his army back the way they'd come.

Having returned to London, Paulinus was ordered for a second time, on peril of his life, to go back and capture Anglesey. Having crossed the water (what we now know as the Menai Straits), the Romans confronted the "ghosts" on the beach - who were in fact pacifist Celtic Druids, with their heads daubed with lime, who put up no resistance to the Roman swords, and were promptly annihilated where they stood.

This was a strategically important capture for the Romans, as the Druids on Anglesey were seen as the spiritual leaders of the Celtic tribes - they also controlled the shipping of gold to and from the Northern parts of Britain.

Various strongholds in Wales continued to resist control for a further 17 years, though, and it was only under Agricola, in 78AD, that the conquest of Wales was finally regarded as being complete.
Logged
Chef Geoff
Archaeological and Hardware Advisor
Dark Lord
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9368



WWW
« Reply #52 on: March 22, 2012, 10:05:04 AM »

 Shocked Shocked Shocked Oh now hang, on where on earth did you dig that bit of rubbish up from? very poetic rubbish I'll give you but rubbish all the same.
The Legions were spooked by this, Paulinus tore up his orders from the Emperor Nero, and promptly turned his army back the way they'd come Huh Who says
Having returned to London Huh Why London, in 61 AD London was no more than a shanty town.
pacifist Celtic Druids Huh That sounds like a new age spin on things.
Logged
Kev
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5798


"there as got to be more there " SE & XS user


WWW
« Reply #53 on: March 22, 2012, 10:51:00 AM »

 Grin Grin Grin
off here ................
http://www.funtrivia.com/
Logged
Chef Geoff
Archaeological and Hardware Advisor
Dark Lord
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9368



WWW
« Reply #54 on: March 22, 2012, 11:13:26 AM »

Oh well that explains it, it's American lol. You wouldn't believe the amount of US tourists who come to Glastonbury and are noticeably shocked when they discover King Arthur is only a Legend Cheesy

No I'm afraid none of the above statements are true.
Paulinus never withdrew his legions for any other reason than winter.
London was at that time just a small port, the Capital being Colchester.
And the Druids were destroyed as it's believed they had been the central motivating force in resistance to Roman rule. 
Logged
nobby
Moderator
Superhero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2168


Wanna be boy band....


« Reply #55 on: March 22, 2012, 01:36:40 PM »

I prefer the other story Geoff Grin
Logged

“I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.”
Chef Geoff
Archaeological and Hardware Advisor
Dark Lord
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9368



WWW
« Reply #56 on: March 22, 2012, 01:40:37 PM »

I'd move to America then Grin
Logged
nobby
Moderator
Superhero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2168


Wanna be boy band....


« Reply #57 on: March 22, 2012, 01:42:52 PM »

AND WHAT DO YOU MEAN THERES NO SUCH THING AS KING ARTHUR Angry...... Cry Cry Cry Cry..... Cheesy
Logged

“I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.”
Kev
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5798


"there as got to be more there " SE & XS user


WWW
« Reply #58 on: March 22, 2012, 01:54:45 PM »

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Huh Huh Huh

King Arthur was Real?    September 23, 1998
by Amélie A. Walker
Possible evidence of the existence of Arthur, the legendary warrior king, has been found at Tintagel in Cornwall. A Cornish slate with sixth-century engravings was found in July on the eastern terraces of Tintagel on the edge of a cliff overlooking the place traditionally known as Merlin's Cave. It was discovered under broken pottery and glass from the late sixth or seventh centuries during the re-excavations of an area last dug in the 1930s.

The 8 inch by 14 inch slate bears two inscriptions. The older, upper letters have been broken off and cannot be deciphered. The lower inscription, translated by Charles Thomas of the University of Glasgow, reads "Pater Coliavi ficit Artognov--Artognou, father of a descendant of Coll, has had this built." The inscription is basically in Latin, perhaps with some primitive Irish and British elements, according to Thomas. The British name represented by the Latin Atrognov is Arthnou. Geoffrey Wainwright of English Heritage says that the name is close enough to refer to Arthur, the legendary king and warrior. Thomas, however, believes that we must dismiss ideas that the name is associated with King Arthur. Christopher Morris, professor of archaeology at the University of Glasgow and the director of the excavations, feels that the script does not necessarily refer to Arthur, because King Arthur first entered the historical domain in the twelfth century.

The slate, part of a collapsed wall, was reused as a drain cover in the sixth century. The first secular inscription ever found at a site from the Dark Ages in England, the find demonstrates that Latin literacy and the Roman way of life survived the collapse of Roman Britain. It is the first evidence that the skills of reading and writing were handed down in a nonreligious context, according to Morris.

Also found were sherds of Mediterranean amphorae, large vessels used for storing and transporting commodities, and a cache of fragments from a single glass vessel. The latter are from a large glass flagon of a type not found elsewhere in Britain or Ireland during this period, but found in Malaga and Cadiz from the sixth or seventh century. The find indicates, for the first time, a direct link between Spain and Western Britain at this time.

Tintagel has come to be associated with King Arthur as his birthplace, depicted by the Welsh monk Geoffrey of Monmouth in A History of the Kings of Britain (ca. 1139), and renewed by Alfred Lord Tennyson in Idylls of the King in the 1870s.

The Tintagel Excavations are a joint project sponsored by English Heritage and the University of Glasgow.
Logged

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Home
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal