Choose fontsize:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
News
jamiepearce
January 17, 2024, 07:59:51 PM
 Evening.been out the picture for a few years.is there any weekenders coming up this year?
rookypair
January 04, 2024, 09:57:08 AM
 I think everyone has dispersed in all directions. Good to see some of the original peeps posting to 
rjm
January 03, 2024, 11:26:38 PM
 This site is pretty dead now! 
TOMTOM
January 03, 2024, 05:38:50 PM
 HI IM HERE ANY RALLYS
dances with badgers
December 28, 2023, 09:40:42 AM
 the dreaded social media lol
DEADLOCK
December 27, 2023, 08:26:38 AM
 Still going social media plays a big part 
dances with badgers
December 26, 2023, 10:41:07 PM
 This site used to be amazing, where has everybody gone? 

View All

 

Currently there is 1 User in the Chatroom!





Click here if you
need van signs


Or here if you
need magnetic signs


Or here if you
need a
Corporate Video Production Company in Milton Keynes

See our
privacy policy here


Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: How rain revealed Shropshire’s Roman coin haul  (Read 4398 times)
Kev
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5798


"there as got to be more there " SE & XS user


WWW
« on: October 27, 2011, 02:42:08 PM »

 
The Shropshire coin hoard


How rain revealed Shropshire’s Roman coin haul
Wednesday 26th October 2011, 10:00PM BST.
 
The Shropshire coin hoard
A sudden downpour led a rookie treasure hunter to one of the biggest hoards of Roman coins ever found in Shropshire, he revealed today.

Nic Davies from Ford, near Shrewsbury, has become the envy of time-served metal detecting enthusiasts after digging up the haul of bronze coins in 2009.

The hoard, which has been described as an ‘exceptional find’ was yesterday declared as treasure by coroner John Ellery at a hearing in Wem.

Speaking after the hearing Mr Davies said: “I’d never hunted for treasure before with a metal detector but a family friend has done it for 34 years, so I guess this hoard gives them renewed hope.

“I’d been at the site for three or four hours and found nothing.

“It started to rain so I stepped into a gap in the bushes and then the metal detector beeped so curiosity got the better of me.

“I found one coin just beneath the soil and then dug down and found more and more coins. I was quite shocked.”

Yesterday’s treasure trove inquest heard from Peter Reavill, finds liaison officer for the Portable Antiquities Scheme, which records archaeological finds made by the public.

He said the coins at the top of the pot appear to date from the period 333-335AD, late in the reign of British Roman Emperor Constantine I.

Coins at the bottom appeared to be about 10 years older, suggesting the pot was either part of a community ceremony to honour the gods or perhaps about six months’ pay for a Roman legionnaire.

He said British Museum experts who examined the find said the coins came from across the Roman empire in places like Greece, Turkey, Germany and France.

Designs on the backs of some of the coins, which are known as nummi, allude to the legend of the twin founders of Rome, Romulus and Remus, who can be clearly be seen suckling their she-wolf mother on one.

Another design celebrates the city of Constantinople as the ‘new Rome’.

Experts have said the hoard lifted the lid on the way people in Shropshire lived at that time, revealing that people outside the south of Britain were used to using coins as a currency system.

Dr Eleanor Ghey from the British Museum said: “This is an exceptional find of late Roman coins from Shropshire.

“It challenges the view that the wealth circulating in the south of Britain at this time had little impact on the areas further north and west.

“Some of the coins in the hoard were produced in the eastern Mediterranean and travelled a long distance in the short time before they were buried.

“The fact that the coins were still in their pot when it was excavated has given us a fascinating snapshot of Roman life. Whoever buried these coins kept their location secret for a number of years before adding more to the hoard.”

Emma-Kate Lanyon, curator for Shropshire Museums said: “This is a very exciting find and probably the largest coin hoard, at least in modern times, to be recovered from the county.

“The Treasure Act and Portable Antiquities Scheme is now over 14 years old and has vastly increased our understanding of Shropshire’s past by bringing finds like this to the attention of archaeologists.”

Giving evidence, Mr Reavill added the lower parts of the coin pot also contained several fragments of preserved cloth and an iron nail. He said it was hugely significant, as organic remains normally rot in the ground. The presence of the materials could, he said, suggest a nailed up bag, deposited within the hoard.

This practice, although rare, is possible evidence of a ritual offering.

In the Roman world gifts were given to the gods in anticipation of future results, such as recovery of stolen property, improved health or a good harvest.

The inquest heard the site of the find cannot be disclosed for security reasons. The inquest heard the coins were found just off a bridleway in a wooded area near Shrewsbury. Mr Ellery said: “I have heard all the evidence I am going to hear into discovery of the Roman coin hoard in the Shrewsbury area. I have the exact location but I’m not going to disclose the precise details to preserve the integrity of the site.

“It’s clear the finder did not have permission to enter the land with his detector. People should always seek permission. The advantage for the finder is that he is likely to receive a substantial reward for the find.

“I conclude and declare that the hoard of 9,315 coins found by Mr Davies are treasure.”

By Tom Johannsen


Read more: http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2011/10/26/how-rain-revealed-shropshires-roman-coin-haul/#ixzz1bzcWHt7d
Logged
heather
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 276



« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2011, 04:13:33 PM »

interesting article, especially the bit when he didnt have permission !   

H
Logged

3 hammered silver
100 penicilian tubes
Kev
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 5798


"there as got to be more there " SE & XS user


WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2011, 04:20:18 PM »

as it as said "However Nic Davies who found the coins did not have permission from the landowner to use a detector." do you think he should get any of the money !!!!!!!!!!


what do members think !!!!! Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Huh


 
The coins offer a "fascinating snapshot" of Roman life, according to the British Museum
Logged
Chef Geoff
Archaeological and Hardware Advisor
Dark Lord
**********
Offline Offline

Posts: 9368



WWW
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2011, 04:22:49 PM »

I think he should get....................................6 months Grin
Logged
relichunting
Restricted Member
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 458



« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2011, 04:28:28 PM »

The finder should get nothing,he was on the site for three or four hours without permission

In fact I hope he is prosecuted by the land owner for theft/criminal damage

If he is awarded half the value,does that mean we can all go on farmers fields without permission, find hoards and get rewarded.

Logged

Deus 2013

Hammies: 32
Saxon gilded saucer brooch 1
Roman nail cleaner 1
Roman brooches 4
Roman silver 2
Nick
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 173


Minelab SE Pro & CS4pi user


« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2011, 06:21:03 PM »

He shouldn't have been there.

So he deserves.............zilch.
Logged
ysbytymike
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 733


Bliss V3, Headhunter Pro, Teknetic T2, C-Scope CS7


WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2011, 07:05:22 PM »

I understand and agree that entering land without permission is a big no no. But lets not jump to conclusions here.

Was he detecting on the land or on the bridleway. Did he entered the land which might have afforded more tree shelter
against the elements - we've all run for the nearest shelter without thinking, I know I have.

I'm sure this will/has been looked at before any decision was made, so I think making rash judgements without knowing ALL the facts
is not really helpful to the hobby or individuals.

Mike
Logged

Life is all about questions - Death brings all the answers   (md)
nfl
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1286



« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2011, 07:22:18 PM »

i havent ran for the nearset shelter from the elements,,although ive tected in the middle of a raging thunderstorm before and the farmer farmer walking past knowing im a idiot Grin,,,,,,,most bridleways and pathways are owned by someone,he shouldent have been there without permission ,or just maybe in that posistion  i would take the hoard home and then phone flo giving him referance to a regular farm i tect WITH PERMISSION Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin{hope the vexatious blogger with incredibly itchy underpants isnt listening Grin
Logged

2012 finds
29 hammys
24 other silver coins pre 1947
2 silver thimbles,,,,2 parts gold medi ring
half noble coin weight
3 silver roman
celtic broach
celtic terret ring
b/a  axe head
1 pilgrims ampulla {1350-1450}
12thc personnel lead seal matrix
2 parts fibula 1 complete
14thc ring broac
Neil
Administrator
Superhero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4973



« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2011, 07:23:12 PM »

Is a difficult one, in that he's done the right thing by owning up to the find, but is clearly in the wrong being there in the first place. That said though I dare say a few of us have detected Bridlepaths, common land. wandered onto the wrong field or paths between fields over the years. Possibly be accident, but often without thinking.

Its going to be interesting to see how the law percieves it on this occasion.

By the way the photo is not the finder - its Peter Revell - the FLO we have had at a few of our rallies in the past!

I am going to watch this case with great interest as I feel the outcome may well give fuel to our detractors. We all know of one who will be doing cartwheels about this! But he's best ignored!

"just Neil"
Logged

There comes a time in every rightly constructed boys life when he has a raging urge to go somewhere and dig for hidden treasure.

Mark Twain 1835 - 1910

If anyone wants to sell any S c r a p gold or sovereigns, regardless of condition -  ask me for a price first please.
bymatt666 (byron)
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1833


R.A.R.E.member


« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2011, 09:43:31 PM »

“It’s clear the finder did not have permission to enter the land with his detector. People should always seek permission. The advantage for the finder is that he is likely to receive a substantial reward for the find.

“I conclude and declare that the hoard of 9,315 coins found by Mr Davies are treasure.”

it's not clear whether the coroner said the finder is likely to receive a substantial reward or the writer of the article.....it starts with inverted commas but does'nt end with them ??  Undecided......byron
Logged

i'd give up chocolate....but i'm no quitter !
minelab explorer xs
NCMD member
rjm
Superhero Member
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 2488


XP Deus


« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2011, 12:15:00 PM »


It could be that he was on the land purely by mistake.

Some farms have hundreds of acres and, sometimes, don't own a field in the middle of others!  I have some
farms which I thought were owned by one farmer that actually belonged to another.

I have accidentally detected on fields I thought belonged to a particular famer AND I know others that
have done so. No doubt you may have!

There is a likelihood the finder wouldn't have declared the hoard if he knew he didn't have permission,
but declared it thinking he did have permission?

It sounds like you are finding someone guilty without all the facts. ALL the facts weren't mentioned in
the article.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty!
Logged

bulbus
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 71


« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2011, 07:55:35 PM »

 i think that there should be some sort of repercusion as this may say to other members of the public that they can go and acquire a detector and just go where ever they want to. i,m lucky that i know a lot of landowners that let me go on, but people just going out there could spoil it for others. this i,m sure would encourage night hawkers aswell..
i,ve only been doing this since this summer but you do have to abide by the law and respect the landowners requirements... without them we,d be knackered....
   
 
Logged
Pipster
Restricted Member
Superhero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1458


Minelab E-trac & Deus user


WWW
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2011, 07:13:46 AM »


It could be that he was on the land purely by mistake.

Some farms have hundreds of acres and, sometimes, don't own a field in the middle of others!  I have some
farms which I thought were owned by one farmer that actually belonged to another.

I have accidentally detected on fields I thought belonged to a particular famer AND I know others that
have done so. No doubt you may have!

There is a likelihood the finder wouldn't have declared the hoard if he knew he didn't have permission,
but declared it thinking he did have permission?

It sounds like you are finding someone guilty without all the facts. ALL the facts weren't mentioned in
the article.

Innocent until PROVEN guilty!
Well said Bob !!
Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Home
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal