DetectingWales.com

Metal Detecting Discussions => Beat the Doc... Identify your finds here => Topic started by: mickycoin "mick" on March 30, 2010, 11:49:52 AM



Title: fake or not??
Post by: mickycoin "mick" on March 30, 2010, 11:49:52 AM
hi peter i found this coin sunday around the kidwelly area, i have put a picture on of the coin already, but will post the best side again to refresh your memory, question, as the coin onlys weighs 2.4 grams is it  a fake??, the coin is silver, but at lastnights meeting everyone who picked the coin up commented on how light the coin was, is there a set weight for this coin?? thanks for your time peter  mickycoin mick ;D ;D


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: Chef Geoff on March 30, 2010, 12:02:46 PM
It does sound a bit light but how accurate are your scales?
they usually weigh in more around 2.7g, so you wouldn't notice the difference in your hand.


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: mickycoin "mick" on March 30, 2010, 12:08:10 PM
hi Geoff, i think they are quite accurate, but feel a lot happyer already as  .o3 of a gram  isnt that far out  thanks for your reply  mickycoin mick ;D ;D


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: The Doc on March 30, 2010, 05:45:59 PM
I don't think that's too far out and probably is genuine - a nice find.


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: zorro on March 30, 2010, 05:47:38 PM
Mick can you post a pic of reverse as well and when peter confirms I.D i'll put it in database....fake or not.
saw it last night it is a strange one i'll admit put the weight is very very close. could ground conditions have caused the pitting??


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: zorro on March 30, 2010, 05:48:53 PM
peter can you I.D it just from the obverse side?


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: mickycoin "mick" on March 30, 2010, 06:18:46 PM
reverse for you kev,  mickycoin mick ;D ;D


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: The Doc on March 30, 2010, 07:04:56 PM
Looking at both sides, I still think this is genuine.


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: zorro on March 30, 2010, 07:07:53 PM
Can you I.D it please peter?


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: mickycoin "mick" on March 30, 2010, 07:13:23 PM
THANKS KEV FOR THE HELP, AND THATS GOOD ENOUGHT FOR ME PETER  THANKYOU AGAIN  MICKYCOIN MICK ;D ;D


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: The Doc on March 30, 2010, 07:18:40 PM
James I Sixpence, Second coinage, third bust, mintmark rose, dated 1605. Spink 2657.


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: zorro on March 30, 2010, 07:34:19 PM
WOW peter.....wouldn't like to hazard a guess as to what day it was struck would you (seems thats all you've left out!)   :D
now in database thanks peter, and mick


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: The Doc on March 30, 2010, 09:33:32 PM
WOW peter.....wouldn't like to hazard a guess as to what day it was struck would you (seems thats all you've left out!)   :D
now in database thanks peter, and mick

I would say it was struck in the Spring of 1605, could be as late as March 31st, but most probably...
























April 1st ;D


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: zorro on March 30, 2010, 09:37:20 PM
I know one thing i'm not going to bet against your predictions mate  :D


Title: Re: fake or not??
Post by: digger on March 31, 2010, 12:07:46 PM
Hi Peter, are you sure it wasn,t struck on April 1st.   ::) ::)


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal