DetectingWales.com

Non-Detecting Stuff => General Discussion => Topic started by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 04:45:33 PM



Title: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 04:45:33 PM
what happened in AD43  ??? ??? ??? ???


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Roman (Ray) on March 20, 2012, 04:47:30 PM
the romans invaided britain. ;D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Chef Geoff on March 20, 2012, 04:48:00 PM
The Italians opened lots of restaurants in Britain :D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Pipster on March 20, 2012, 04:50:50 PM
Handyman Alans 18th Birthday  ;D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 04:52:25 PM
correct Ray, Chef & Pipster like those answers. ;D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Roman (Ray) on March 20, 2012, 04:53:18 PM
LOL. ;D..


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 04:53:47 PM
how long did it take on average for a mile of roman road to be built. ??? ??? ??? ??? ???


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Roman (Ray) on March 20, 2012, 04:57:33 PM
im gonna say there was quite a few building it i should imagine..3 days.lol


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Pipster on March 20, 2012, 05:00:00 PM
If was anything like Monmouthshire council at least two years  ;D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: dances with badgers on March 20, 2012, 05:00:48 PM
geoff was born  :D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Roman (Ray) on March 20, 2012, 05:02:36 PM
geoff was born  :D
cheffy was born well before then badgers..lol.hehe..


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: nomad on March 20, 2012, 05:03:06 PM
 ;D ;D ;D..would that be a four minute mile


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 05:06:00 PM
like all your answers guys but RAY does it again................... its 3 to 4 days and the Romans done that for a 100 years. ;)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 05:06:51 PM
What was the Roman name for Scotland       ??? ??? ??? ??? ???


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: nobby on March 20, 2012, 05:07:39 PM
4 minute mile.....was roger banister building it? ;D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Roman (Ray) on March 20, 2012, 05:08:06 PM
wwwoohhoo what a guess..well chuft..lol


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: nomad on March 20, 2012, 05:09:06 PM
 ;D...easy to beat at rugby


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: dances with badgers on March 20, 2012, 05:09:58 PM
bloody hell thats nuts  :o.


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: nobby on March 20, 2012, 05:11:04 PM
was it Jock :D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Pipster on March 20, 2012, 05:12:43 PM
;D...easy to beat at rugby

Thats rich  


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Tafflaff (Rob) on March 20, 2012, 05:22:01 PM
CALEDONIA


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 05:40:31 PM
CALEDONIA correct our Taff. ;)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Pipster on March 20, 2012, 05:41:10 PM
Well done Taff  ;)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 05:41:55 PM
Emperor Hadrian ruled that a person accidentally finding a treasure trove on another's land became what     ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Pipster on March 20, 2012, 05:47:59 PM
Rich  ;D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 05:55:04 PM
yes Pipster ,but not the answer im looking for. ??? ??? ;D ;)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: nobby on March 20, 2012, 06:02:32 PM
does he get half??


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 06:11:45 PM
correct Nobby   ;)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: nobby on March 20, 2012, 06:17:31 PM
who had the other haf?? the roman empire or the land owner?


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 06:20:32 PM
land owner. ;)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 06:22:11 PM
What was the lower legal age limit for a young man to be accepted into the Roman legions  ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: garethj on March 20, 2012, 06:34:08 PM
16 ?


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Roman (Ray) on March 20, 2012, 06:36:35 PM
13 is my guess.


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 06:41:56 PM
close guys. ;)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Mike on March 20, 2012, 06:43:58 PM
11


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 06:48:54 PM
mike  ;D
(http://i1138.photobucket.com/albums/n523/casa-dos/th_angry-baby1.jpg)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: rookypair on March 20, 2012, 06:50:20 PM
17 ?


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 07:01:53 PM
correct Rookypair  ;)
The lower legal age limit for entry into the legions was 17 years of age. It is known, though, that younger men, perhaps in a time of crisis, or deceiving the recruiting officer about their true age, managed to join the legions. It was a dangerous life and only about half (50%) of recruits survived their 25 or more years of service to final discharge.
Those soldiers that did survive generally preferred to stay in the province in which they had been stationed and had come to know well, sometimes having established families and even business connections there.
Sometimes the emperors established 'veteran colonies' in the provinces and a discharged soldier could accept a plot of land in lieu of his gratuity.


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 20, 2012, 07:04:20 PM
and one to finish tonight's quiz
who's this famous chap................. ;D ;D ;D ;D :D ;)
                                                                                         (http://i1138.photobucket.com/albums/n523/casa-dos/churchill.jpg)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Mike on March 20, 2012, 08:10:45 PM
winston nomad  :D :D :D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: nobby on March 20, 2012, 09:41:01 PM
 :D :D :D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 21, 2012, 03:32:20 PM
correct Winston Nomad. :D :D ;)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 21, 2012, 04:12:46 PM
Wales is regarded as a Celtic nation. The whole "Celtic thing" is pretty unclear to most historians, as the Celtic tradition is very much based on oral history - however, most historians agree that the Celts first settled on the land mass now known as the United Kingdom in what time period  ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ;) i will take a 100 years each way  ;D ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Chef Geoff on March 21, 2012, 04:52:23 PM
480BC


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Mike on March 21, 2012, 05:00:51 PM
480BC

which month  :D :D :D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: dances with badgers on March 21, 2012, 05:03:57 PM
april lol


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Chef Geoff on March 21, 2012, 05:05:58 PM
June 14th, 0310 ferry from Dieppe


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 21, 2012, 05:08:15 PM
Chef its.600-100BC...
"Who exactly were the Celts?" is a question which vexes historians on a daily basis. The first written evidence suggests that they were seen in the region North of the Alps around 1000-600 BC, known collectively as "the Keltoi" - but as a wandering race, they were chased to the nether regions of Western Europe - there are traces of them around the coasts of Italy, Spain, Portugal and the Lowlands - before finally settling in what we know these days as the United Kingdom, Ireland and Brittany (in France). But if they were chased out of the Alps for being wandering tribes, where did they come from before that?


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 21, 2012, 05:08:37 PM
In 43AD, the Roman Emperor Claudius invaded Britain. How long did it take the Romans to finally conquer Wales? ??? ??? ??? ???


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: dances with badgers on March 21, 2012, 05:11:01 PM
200 years because they had to stop a lot to take in all the lovely scenary ;D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Chef Geoff on March 21, 2012, 05:14:36 PM
78AD, though there was that scrap in that Mansio down the Cardiff  Road, but I guess that didn't count


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 22, 2012, 08:49:12 AM
correct Chef............................. 35 years.....................

Many is the story told of the Romans' attempts to conquer Wales - one of the most notable is of the Legions, under Paulinus in 61AD, turning up on the coast near what we now call Caernarfon, and being faced apparently by thousands of ghosts on the opposing shore, latter day Anglesey. The Legions were spooked by this, Paulinus tore up his orders from the Emperor Nero, and promptly turned his army back the way they'd come.

Having returned to London, Paulinus was ordered for a second time, on peril of his life, to go back and capture Anglesey. Having crossed the water (what we now know as the Menai Straits), the Romans confronted the "ghosts" on the beach - who were in fact pacifist Celtic Druids, with their heads daubed with lime, who put up no resistance to the Roman swords, and were promptly annihilated where they stood.

This was a strategically important capture for the Romans, as the Druids on Anglesey were seen as the spiritual leaders of the Celtic tribes - they also controlled the shipping of gold to and from the Northern parts of Britain.

Various strongholds in Wales continued to resist control for a further 17 years, though, and it was only under Agricola, in 78AD, that the conquest of Wales was finally regarded as being complete.


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Chef Geoff on March 22, 2012, 10:05:04 AM
 :o :o :o Oh now hang, on where on earth did you dig that bit of rubbish up from? very poetic rubbish I'll give you but rubbish all the same.
The Legions were spooked by this, Paulinus tore up his orders from the Emperor Nero, and promptly turned his army back the way they'd come ??? Who says
Having returned to London ??? Why London, in 61 AD London was no more than a shanty town.
pacifist Celtic Druids ??? That sounds like a new age spin on things.


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 22, 2012, 10:51:00 AM
 ;D ;D ;D
off here ................
http://www.funtrivia.com/ (http://www.funtrivia.com/)


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Chef Geoff on March 22, 2012, 11:13:26 AM
Oh well that explains it, it's American lol. You wouldn't believe the amount of US tourists who come to Glastonbury and are noticeably shocked when they discover King Arthur is only a Legend :D

No I'm afraid none of the above statements are true.
Paulinus never withdrew his legions for any other reason than winter.
London was at that time just a small port, the Capital being Colchester.
And the Druids were destroyed as it's believed they had been the central motivating force in resistance to Roman rule. 


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: nobby on March 22, 2012, 01:36:40 PM
I prefer the other story Geoff ;D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Chef Geoff on March 22, 2012, 01:40:37 PM
I'd move to America then ;D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: nobby on March 22, 2012, 01:42:52 PM
AND WHAT DO YOU MEAN THERES NO SUCH THING AS KING ARTHUR >:(...... :'( :'( :'( :'(..... :D


Title: Re: Quick Question & Answers.
Post by: Kev on March 22, 2012, 01:54:45 PM
 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ??? ??? ???

King Arthur was Real?    September 23, 1998
by Amélie A. Walker
Possible evidence of the existence of Arthur, the legendary warrior king, has been found at Tintagel in Cornwall. A Cornish slate with sixth-century engravings was found in July on the eastern terraces of Tintagel on the edge of a cliff overlooking the place traditionally known as Merlin's Cave. It was discovered under broken pottery and glass from the late sixth or seventh centuries during the re-excavations of an area last dug in the 1930s.

The 8 inch by 14 inch slate bears two inscriptions. The older, upper letters have been broken off and cannot be deciphered. The lower inscription, translated by Charles Thomas of the University of Glasgow, reads "Pater Coliavi ficit Artognov--Artognou, father of a descendant of Coll, has had this built." The inscription is basically in Latin, perhaps with some primitive Irish and British elements, according to Thomas. The British name represented by the Latin Atrognov is Arthnou. Geoffrey Wainwright of English Heritage says that the name is close enough to refer to Arthur, the legendary king and warrior. Thomas, however, believes that we must dismiss ideas that the name is associated with King Arthur. Christopher Morris, professor of archaeology at the University of Glasgow and the director of the excavations, feels that the script does not necessarily refer to Arthur, because King Arthur first entered the historical domain in the twelfth century.

The slate, part of a collapsed wall, was reused as a drain cover in the sixth century. The first secular inscription ever found at a site from the Dark Ages in England, the find demonstrates that Latin literacy and the Roman way of life survived the collapse of Roman Britain. It is the first evidence that the skills of reading and writing were handed down in a nonreligious context, according to Morris.

Also found were sherds of Mediterranean amphorae, large vessels used for storing and transporting commodities, and a cache of fragments from a single glass vessel. The latter are from a large glass flagon of a type not found elsewhere in Britain or Ireland during this period, but found in Malaga and Cadiz from the sixth or seventh century. The find indicates, for the first time, a direct link between Spain and Western Britain at this time.

Tintagel has come to be associated with King Arthur as his birthplace, depicted by the Welsh monk Geoffrey of Monmouth in A History of the Kings of Britain (ca. 1139), and renewed by Alfred Lord Tennyson in Idylls of the King in the 1870s.

The Tintagel Excavations are a joint project sponsored by English Heritage and the University of Glasgow.


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal